<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Emily Sandford</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emilysandford.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emilysandford.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:00:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Identity Crisis by Mary Henslee</title>
		<link>http://www.emilysandford.com/2012/04/identity-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Henslee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emilysandford.com/?p=132#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Oh Emily/Emmie, how you speak my language. I struggle with the same thing (I&#039;ll take your survey, but wanted to comment here too.) I too maintain 2 online entities, not nearly with the following you have, but I like the idea of having 2, mostly because of the differing audience. I liken it to how we as marketers talk to different customer segments differently. You wouldn&#039;t talk to consumers the same way you talk to small businesses or corporations, right? I also maintain my @maryhenslee persona because I was recently in the job market, and I didn&#039;t think my @theweightress content would help me (might it even hurt me?) when it comes to potential employers, The flip side of the argument is of course that YOU are still YOU no matter where you talk to people. So... I don&#039;t think there is a right or wrong, I think it comes down to content and whether it&#039;s applicable to the audience. That, and how much Twitter wrangling you want to do. No matter where you Tweet, you&#039;re awesome, and I&#039;ll be reading!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Emily/Emmie, how you speak my language. I struggle with the same thing (I&#8217;ll take your survey, but wanted to comment here too.) I too maintain 2 online entities, not nearly with the following you have, but I like the idea of having 2, mostly because of the differing audience. I liken it to how we as marketers talk to different customer segments differently. You wouldn&#8217;t talk to consumers the same way you talk to small businesses or corporations, right? I also maintain my @maryhenslee persona because I was recently in the job market, and I didn&#8217;t think my @theweightress content would help me (might it even hurt me?) when it comes to potential employers, The flip side of the argument is of course that YOU are still YOU no matter where you talk to people. So&#8230; I don&#8217;t think there is a right or wrong, I think it comes down to content and whether it&#8217;s applicable to the audience. That, and how much Twitter wrangling you want to do. No matter where you Tweet, you&#8217;re awesome, and I&#8217;ll be reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social Timing by Jeff Dolan</title>
		<link>http://www.emilysandford.com/2011/11/social-timing/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Dolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emilysandford.com/?p=92#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Great reminders Emily! We often forget that online mimics offline when it comes to conversations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great reminders Emily! We often forget that online mimics offline when it comes to conversations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

